S.NO 641. |
Channel NDTV India |
Complainant Ms Manju Sagar, President Karol Bagh Vikas Parishad, New Delhi [MoI&B] |
Date of Broadcast 1.4.2012 |
Complaint MIB forwarded the complaint. The complaint was sent to Mr P. Chidambaram, Union Home Minister regarding objectionable language used by Dr Subramaniam Swamy in the programme Aap Ki Adalat telecast on the channel and was received from |
Decisions 12.7.2012 NBSA noted that it could not take action under its regulations in respect of language used by a guest in a “live show”. If the complainant was offended she could take recourse to the law of the land. The matter be closed and MIB and the broadcaster be informed accordingly. |
S.NO 642. |
Channel Aaj Tak |
Complainant Mr Kiran Raj Shelar [MoI&B] |
Date of Broadcast 18.3.2012 |
Complaint The complaint was regarding telecast of “Superhit Muqabala” on the channel. The complaint was received from MIB vide letter dated 22.6.2012. |
Decisions 12.7.2012 NBSA noted that as was the procedure,vthe broadcaster was advised to submit details of the broadcasts which were considered by the NBSA. It was decided that the response received from the broadcaster be forwarded to the complainant and if the complainant was satisfied the matter be closed. The MIB also be informed accordingly. |
S.NO 643. |
Channel Times Now |
Complainant Mr. Sabyasachi Mitra [MoI&B] |
Date of Broadcast |
Complaint MIB forwarded the complaint which stated that in the programme, Mr. Arnab Goswami, anchor of the programme was referring to a State Government Order which had listed the newspapers that was to be kept in the State libraries. The complainant stated that the Order was a simple order so that there was a proper list and same standard was maintained across all libraries and the budget could also be kept in check.The complainant alleged that the Editor-in-Chief made a statement that the media had been “censored”; media was being “gaged” The biased and irresponsible comments it is alleged was made to defame the Chief Minister of the West Bengal could lead to negative sentiments which can impact growth and discourage investors. |
Decisions 12.7.2012 NBSA noted that the broadcaster had adequately clarified their position relating to the news broadcasts and decided that no further action needs to be taken in the matter. The complaint was closed. |
S.NO 644. |
Channel NA |
Complainant NA |
Date of Broadcast |
Complaint MIB forwarded a complaint against
telecast of programme ‘Third Eye of
Nirmal Baba’ on various TV channels
Mr. Sunil Kumar, Section Officer,
MIB, forwarded complaints of 7
individuals, including the report of
Mr. Anil Chamadia, which he had
already submitted to NBSA. The MIB
had also given the report of EMMC.
The CD and the report of EMMC were
forwarded to member channels i.e. Aaj
Tak, Total TV, IBN7, P7 News &
India TV. |
Decisions 12.7.2012 NBSA noted that the MIB while forwarding the
complaints had drawn the attention of the NBSA
that despite issuance of MIB Advisory dated
29.11.2011 advising all channels to telecast
programmes with due care and maturity, strictly
adhering to programme code, particularly in
respect of programmes that appear to encourage
superstition and blind belief, the above
programmes shown by TV channels were in
violation of Rule 6 (1) (j) “encourages superstition
or blind belief” of the Programme Code. The
NBSA took note of the same and decided that the
complaints relating to Nirmal Baba would be
considered in totality. |
S.NO 645. |
Channel NA |
Complainant NA |
Date of Broadcast |
Complaint MIB had informed NBSA that news
channels Manorama News (NBA
Member), Kalaignar TV, Raj TV,
Asianet News (non-members) had
shown visuals of dead bodies; two channels i.e. TV100 (non member)
had showed a rape victim without
blurring her face and Samay (non
member) had shown “Andhvishwas Ki
Salakhein” and also programmes on
Nirmal Baba. In the same letter MIB
had also drawn the attention of NBSA
that Aaj Tak, IBN7, India TV, P7
News, Total TV, Sony, SAB, AXN
and Star Utsav were also showing
programmes on Nirmal Baba. |
Decisions 12.7.2012 NBSA considered the complaint regarding visuals
of dead bodies shown by Manorama News and
noted that prima-facie the broadcaster had
violated/breached the Specific Guidelines relating to reporting the dead which interalia states that
“the dead must be treated with respect. Close-ups
of dead or mutilated bodies should not be shown”;
and decided that a notice be issued’ NBSA
considered the reply given by Manorama News
and decided that the channel be issued a warning
for violation of the NBSA guideline relating to
reporting of the dead. NBSA also decided that the
broadcaster be asked to submit in writing details of
action taken by the broadcaster to sensitize its
editorial personnel to prevent such violations in
future. |
S.NO 646. |
Channel INDIA TV |
Complainant Various programmes on Nirmal Baba [21 Complainants] |
Date of Broadcast 14.4.2012 to 21.4.2012 |
Complaint Complaints received by India TV and responded to relate to various programmes on Nirmal Baba (19), Paul Dinakaran (1) & Sri Satya Sai Baba (1). |
Decisions 12.7.2012 The NBSA considered all the above complaints and decided that the CD’s along with the study received from Mr Chamadia be forwarded to the media monitoring agency for a report to ascertain whether there have been any violations by broadcasters of the guidelines issued by NBA/ NBSA inter alia guidelines proscribing the spreading of superstition, occultism and blind belief as also guidelines relating to paid-news. Being conscious of the fact that certain matters challenging broadcast of programmes relating to Nirmal Baba and other similar persons are pending before various courts of law, the NBSA decided that a view would be taken on whether the NBSA can take up the matter and if so, which aspect of it. This will be decided after further consideration of the matter. |
S.NO 647. |
Channel Good News Today |
Complainant Mr. Durgesh Agarwal |
Date of Broadcast 13.4.2012 |
Complaint The complainant alleged that the channel was broadcasting a paid advertisement of Nirmal Baba and it was a clear breach of NBA guideline of "Refraining from advocating or encouraging superstition and occultism". |
Decisions 12.7.2012 The NBSA considered all the above complaints and decided that the CD’s along with the study received from Mr Chamadia be forwarded to the media monitoring agency for a report to ascertain whether there have been any violations by broadcasters of the guidelines issued by NBA/ NBSA inter alia guidelines proscribing the spreading of superstition, occultism and blind belief as also guidelines relating to paid-news. Being conscious of the fact that certain matters challenging broadcast of programmes relating to Nirmal Baba and other similar persons are pending before various courts of law, the NBSA decided that since the matter is sub-judice, NBSA cannot proceed under its Regulations. |
S.NO 648. |
Channel NA |
Complainant Mr. Anil Chamadia |
Date of Broadcast |
Complaint The complainant brought to the notice of the Chairperson, NBSA that Media Studies Group had done a study on Nirmal Baba and manipulation of TRP on different T.V. Channels. Media Studies Group in its study found that race of earning more TRPs among few news channels by telecasting “paid” slot of “Third Eye of Nirmal Baba” seemed a product of loopholes in TRPs system which requires an urgent attention. The complainant had desired that the Study be treated as a complaint in the interest of society particularly viewers of T.V. channels. |
Decisions 12.7.2012 The NBSA considered all the above complaints and decided that the CD’s along with the study received from Mr Chamadia be forwarded to the media monitoring agency for a report to ascertain whether there have been any violations by broadcasters of the guidelines issued by NBA/ NBSA inter alia guidelines proscribing the spreading of superstition, occultism and blind belief as also guidelines relating to paid-news. Being conscious of the fact that certain matters challenging broadcast of programmes relating to Nirmal Baba and other similar persons are pending before various courts of law, the NBSA decided that since the matter is sub-judice, NBSA cannot proceed under its Regulations. |
S.NO 649. |
Channel ETV2 |
Complainant Mr. P.R. Kiran Kumar Reddy, Treasurer, YSR Congress Party |
Date of Broadcast 27.3.2012 |
Complaint The complaint was regarding telecast of a news story titled “What Botsa says in EMAAR case”. |
Decisions 12.7.2012 NBSA noted that since the matter was sub judice it would not be able to proceed under the NBSA regulations. and the matter be closed. |
S.NO 650. |
Channel Sakshi |
Complainant Mr. Yanamala Ramakrishnudu, TDP Politburau Member, Telugu Desam Party, Hyderabad |
Date of Broadcast 12.5.2012 & 14.5.2012 |
Complaint The complaint alleged that, just 3 days before the polling of bye elections in Andhra Pradesh the channel relayed a press conference by one Mr. K. Mohan who made wild allegations of giving Rs.5. to 10 crores to Mr. Chandrababu Naidu, President, TDP in 1999. |
Decisions 12.7.2012 NBSA noted that since the matter was sub judice it would not be able to proceed under the NBSA regulations and the matter be closed. |